Speculation Rules 预渲染优化这个话题社区讨论了很多次，但随着版本迭代，很多结论需要更新。本文基于最新版本重新梳理。

Getting Started

Here is a complete example:

const observer = new PerformanceObserver((list) => {
  for (const entry of list.getEntries()) {
    if (entry.entryType === 'largest-contentful-paint') {
      reportMetric('LCP', entry.startTime)
    }
    if (entry.entryType === 'first-input') {
      reportMetric('FID', entry.processingStart - entry.startTime)
    }
  }
})
observer.observe({ entryTypes: ['largest-contentful-paint', 'first-input'] })

Pay attention to boundary condition handling, which is critical in production.

Source Code Analysis

The key lies in understanding the core logic:

const observer = new PerformanceObserver((list) => {
  for (const entry of list.getEntries()) {
    if (entry.entryType === 'largest-contentful-paint') {
      reportMetric('LCP', entry.startTime)
    }
    if (entry.entryType === 'first-input') {
      reportMetric('FID', entry.processingStart - entry.startTime)
    }
  }
})
observer.observe({ entryTypes: ['largest-contentful-paint', 'first-input'] })

Performance optimization should be tailored to specific scenarios; not all cases require over-optimization.

Real-World Applications

We can improve it in the following ways:

const observer = new PerformanceObserver((list) => {
  for (const entry of list.getEntries()) {
    if (entry.entryType === 'largest-contentful-paint') {
      reportMetric('LCP', entry.startTime)
    }
    if (entry.entryType === 'first-input') {
      reportMetric('FID', entry.processingStart - entry.startTime)
    }
  }
})
observer.observe({ entryTypes: ['largest-contentful-paint', 'first-input'] })

This approach has been running stably in production for over six months and has been practically validated.

Optimization Tips

Let's start with the basic implementation:

const observer = new PerformanceObserver((list) => {
  for (const entry of list.getEntries()) {
    if (entry.entryType === 'largest-contentful-paint') {
      reportMetric('LCP', entry.startTime)
    }
    if (entry.entryType === 'first-input') {
      reportMetric('FID', entry.processingStart - entry.startTime)
    }
  }
})
observer.observe({ entryTypes: ['largest-contentful-paint', 'first-input'] })

This code demonstrates the basic usage. In real projects, you also need to consider error handling and edge cases.

Pitfall Guide

Building on this foundation, we can further optimize:

const observer = new PerformanceObserver((list) => {
  for (const entry of list.getEntries()) {
    if (entry.entryType === 'largest-contentful-paint') {
      reportMetric('LCP', entry.startTime)
    }
    if (entry.entryType === 'first-input') {
      reportMetric('FID', entry.processingStart - entry.startTime)
    }
  }
})
observer.observe({ entryTypes: ['largest-contentful-paint', 'first-input'] })

This pattern is very practical in large projects and can significantly reduce maintenance costs.

Summary

• In team collaboration, conventions and documentation are more important than the technology itself
• Stay updated with the community; technical solutions need continuous iteration
• Don't adopt new technology just for the sake of it